Date |
Required
Reading |
Click here for syllabus (adobe.pdf) | Career
& Job Info
|
Sept 8 |
Introduction &
Greeting |
I would recommend bookmarking this page for
further reference. You may need to hit the Reload/Refresh button to get
the latest version.
|
Sept
13 |
Reiman, CJ
Ethics (intro); Nash, Teaching Ethics |
If
Reiman’s chapter introducing the moral theories is complex, please use
the links on the class webpage to explore the companion information on the
internet. Each theory has a summary and additional links to explain key
concepts.
|
Sept
15 |
Part 1,
Bazelon |
|
Sept
20 |
Part 1,
Katz |
IN CLASS QUIZ #1: The Katz
reading in the textbook on impossible attempts discusses a number of
cases. One case is Commonwealth v Dunnaway. What are the facts of
this case, the problem with the attempted incest charge, and the final
decision of the court (did attempted rape or attempted incest better fit
the facts)?
|
Sept
22 |
Part 2,
Feinberg p 87-88 (skip section 4) & 92 (Mill) - 108
Class will cover substantial
material not in the text
|
- One could stroll down Alabama's southern streets selling semiautomatic rifles and dildos, and be arrested for the dildos.
There's a more detailed news
article from law.com and a thoughtful analysis
of the right to sexual privacy in a Findlaw.com column.
- Michigan
sodomy law info
- Meiwes, a German citizen, has freely admitted to dismembering another German man and eating his flesh. Indeed, Meiwes carefully preserved the killing on videotape and still had pieces of the body in his freezer when he was arrested. During much of the process of dismemberment, the victim reportedly remained conscious.
The obstacle to a murder charge is the fact that the evidence incontrovertibly shows that Meiwes's victim wanted to be eaten. Indeed, he had agreed to the arrangement over the Internet, answering an ad placed by Meiwes that specifically sought a person who wanted to be slaughtered and cannibalized.
In the U.S., the victim's consent is no defense to murder, and it would be easy to prosecute an American counterpart to
Meiwes. But in Germany, the victim's consent renders the crime a "killing on request" -- that is, an instance of illegal euthanasia. Unfortunately, this offense is punishable by a very modest sentence of from six months to five years of incarceration.
[Is it Always Torture to Dismember and Eat a Conscious Human Being?
Findlaw.com]
|
Sept
27 |
Part 2,
Drug debate (Trebach and Inciardi) |
PAPER
1 DUE: For this paper, you will need
to read two Washington Post stories that you will (free registration to the site is required). Both of these
articles deal with differences between the U.S. and Canada on a variety of
issues involving paternalism and legal moralism. The first is "Whoa! Canada!"
and the second is "A Tolerance for IV Drug Users".
In a 2-3
page paper, define what legal moralism is, identify the issues raised in
the articles that relate to moralism, and discuss how Canada is different
from the U.S. on these issues. Do the same for paternalism. Make sure to
structure your paper in terms of moralism and paternalism; do not simply
summarize one article, then the next. I realize people have strong
reactions to some of these issues, but the paper is to make sure you
understand the newspaper articles and place them in the framework of
concepts provided by the book. The paper should not be full of your
personal feelings about Canadian policy (our class discussion will give
you a chance to discuss your reactions).
|
Sept
29 |
Part 2, Prostitution (In re P; MacKinnon; Committee for
Prostitutes’ Rights) |
|
Oct
4 |
Part 2,
Hate
Crime (Wisc v Mitchell)
|
IN
CLASS QUIZ #2: Read the Findlaw.com column about the KKK and
the NYPD. The quiz will ask you (1) what was at issue here, (2) what were
the grounds for the court's decision, and (3) why does the author of the
column critique the court? As with quiz 1, answers do not need to be long,
but should try to be specific about the issue, ground and critique.
|
Oct
6 |
Part 2,
Corporate Violence (Reiman, AMA)
|
|
Oct
11 |
Review
& catch up |
- Review Sheet
- BONUS LINK: What was the issue in VA
v Black, and what did the court decide (was law upheld, and why/why
not)?
|
Oct
13 |
TEST 1 remember
to be on time because no one will be admitted to take the final after the
first person has left
|
Oct
18 |
Appendix on Codes of Ethics; Part 3, Kleinig; |
|
Oct 20 |
Part 3, Skolnick & Leo; Brewer v Williams (on web) |
|
Oct 25 |
Part 3, Marx; US v Tobias; |
|
Oct 27 |
Part 3, Selective
Enforcement (Kleinig, Reiman) |
IN
CLASS QUIZ #3:
Read Part III of Why
Driving While Black Matters,
where the author lists six specific reasons. The quiz will ask you to
review of THREE of these reasons as well as their definition or
explanation. Please know not just the key words ('Distortion of the social
world') but also what this phrase means). This material will also be on
the test.
|
Nov 1 |
Part 4, Lawyers’
Ethics - Haskell
|
|
Nov 3 |
Part 4, Amar &
Cochran debate Defendants' Rights
|
|
Nov 8 |
Part 4,
Weinstein, Kipnis
|
|
Nov 10 |
Review & catch up |
|
Nov
15 |
TEST
2 remember
to be on time because no one will be admitted to take the final after the
first person has left
|
Nov
17 |
Part 5,
Treatment of Inmates - Gorman |
NO CLASS:
I WILL BE OUT OF TOWN FOR A CONFERENCE -
QUIZ 4
WILL BE ON NOV 29
|
Nov
22 |
Part 5,
Treatment of Inmates - Newman |
IN
CLASS QUIZ #4 (Moved to Nov 29): spanking
machines. The quiz will ask about spanking machines:
(1)
what some people see as the problem with whipping and (2) how the spanking
machine could promote the administration of justice.
|
Thanksgiving [No classes, but University open Wed;
Classes resume Monday] |
Nov
29 |
Part 5: National Council of Churches on death penalty;
Nathanson, Reiman, van den Haag exchange; American Medical Association |
|
Dec
1 |
finish death penalty material |
|
Dec
6 |
Part 6, Strossen and Allen debate |
PAPER
#2 Due:
Read
the materials on the class webpage about
the virtual child pornography case. The quiz will ask you about (1) what
is 'virtual child porn', (2) what is the significance of the Ferber
case, and (3) why doesn't the law prohibiting 'real' child porn also apply
to 'virtual' child porn? (4) why is the
reasoning in the majority and dissent about whether virtual child porn
should be illegal? (last question should be a large portion of the paper)
|
Dec
8 |
Part 6,
Reiman |
|
Dec
13 |
Part 6, Seagal;
Leighton |
|
Dec
15 |
Final Exam
- 11:30 - 1
Bonus: Rumsfeld v.
FAIR (Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights)
remember
to be on time because no one will be admitted to take the final after the
first person has left |